Trump Says No Right of Return for Palestinians Under His Gaza Proposal
February 10th, 2025Annexing Canada? Annexing Greenland? Those are somewhat easy to dismiss. (Right? Right!?!)
There is, however, some sort of X factor between Trump and Zionism, which means that we should take Trump much more seriously when it comes to the Gaza situation.
When I first heard Trump’s Gaza plan, my first thought was, “He’s having some sort of Biden moment.”
It isn’t that.
Despite his staff continuously trying to walk this back, Trump keeps reiterating it.
In trying to understand this, everything I’m finding is similar to this discussion below. Essentially, there’s a lot of bewilderment and a belief that Trump isn’t actually going to do it:
Via: Al Jazeera:
United States President Donald Trump has confirmed that his proposal for mass displacement in Gaza does not include a right of return for Palestinians in the enclave.
In an interview with Fox News, partially aired on Monday, Trump also reiterated his push to “own” Gaza.
Asked whether Palestinians would be allowed to return to their territory under his plan, Trump said, “No, they wouldn’t.”
The US president’s plan to empty Gaza of its population has been forcefully rejected across the Middle East – including by Egypt and Jordan, the main countries that Trump says he wants to host displaced Palestinians.
Rights groups have also condemned the push, saying that it would amount to ethnic cleansing.
Trump’s assertion that he is seeking the permanent displacement of people in Gaza appears to contradict recent comments by his aides who said that the enclave’s residents would be able to return after the area is rebuilt.
Last week, White House spokesperson Karoline Leavitt said people in Gaza would be “temporarily relocated”.
Secretary of State Marco Rubio also said that the displacement of Palestinians in Gaza would be in the “interim”, and residents would be able to “move back in” after reconstruction.
It’s insane. Similar to doing the same thing repeatedly in that same region.
Maybe we shouldn’t dismiss Canada and Greenland due to the resources during worldrealignment. Is this battle with ancient capital in London? Is this Join-or-Die 2.0?
On the other hand. Nothing happened. Nothing ever happened. Even while it was happening. It wasn’t happening.
“Maybe we shouldn’t dismiss Canada and Greenland due to the resources during worldrealignment.”
Trump Says Talk Of Wanting Canada to Be A Part of US Is Serious
https://www.zerohedge.com/political/trump-says-talk-wanting-canada-be-part-us-serious
People who don’t take govt’s foretelling of our future seriously won’t be prepared when it arrives. They will have surrendered any chance of preventing or deterring it.
The past offers countless examples: Orwell’s 1984, Reagan’s StarWars, WHO’s Agenda 21. Been there, done that and are constantly ‘improving’ upon it (AI, UFO’s, WWIII). It’s the new normal.
The globalists (zionists) behind current developments want one world govt. Placing Canada, Mexico and the US under one govt is a continent-wide step in that direction. Greenland, being so nearby, is a logical addition.
The racial and cultural unity of each country is broken by encouraging or forcing their populations to intermix. It is a world-wide step in that direction, building the Tower of Babel, which will undermine social cooperation and cohesion. People busy fighting among themselves can’t win WWIII. As the dust clears, the globalists will simply take over and deal with us as they please via their vast technology grid (AI, UFO’s).
The only surprise here is that Trump apparently doesn’t always inform his team of these plans before he announces them to us. Maybe he thinks leaks are possible among them? Somebody should tell them to always keep a straight face when he’s talking publicly, no matter what he says.
I would find it hard to beleive that the US is serious about Canada because that would like adding a second California in the US. Democrats would always win the elections.
Plus, I first heard that idea when I was in high school, 60 years ago. No one took it seriously then; it was too weird to contemplate. It faded from public discussion, but the possibility had been planted in our heads. Now it’s in bold type on govt’s to-do list.
Does anybody hear much protest from Canada? I don’t, and I live 50 miles from the border. British Columbia seems to welcome it; they think (or say they think) that Trump will actually destroy their fentanyl industry. So, my thinking is, not if, but when.
Speaking of the same party winning the elections every time: that’s tantamount to 2024 being the last purportedly competitive election. And the president being able to act like a dictator from then on. Have we heard those threats/predictions before?
Politico in 2023:
“Former President Donald Trump… floated the idea of a third term if he wins in November.”
“Trump said, ‘You know, FDR 16 years — almost 16 years — he was four terms. I don’t know, are we going to be considered three-term? Or two-term?’ ”
“Trump has said he’d be a dictator ‘only on day one'”.
If EO’s make a president a dictator, as the Republicans said Biden was, and since Trump is still issuing them 43 days later…
Democrat and Republican presidents used to take turns playing good cop/bad cop. Now each one plays both. Trump says he’ll send the illegal immigrants (said to be 11 million) home and make all Canadians and Mexicans (169 million) citizens of the US.