WHO (Finally) Admits PCR Tests Create False Positives
December 20th, 2020Via: Off Guardian:
So why has the WHO finally decided to say this is wrong? What reason could they have for finally choosing to recognise this simple reality?
The answer to that is potentially shockingly cynical: We have a vaccine now. We don’t need false positives anymore.
Notionally, the system has produced its miracle cure. So, after everyone has been vaccinated, all the PCR tests being done will be done “under the new WHO guidelines”, and running only 25-30 cycles instead of 35+.
Lo and behold, the number of “positive cases” will plummet, and we’ll have confirmation that our miracle vaccine works.
After months of flooding the data pool with false positives, miscounting deaths “by accident”, adding “Covid19 related death” to every other death certificate…they can stop. The create-a-pandemic machine can be turned down to zero again.
…as long as we all do as we’re told. Any signs of dissent – masses of people refusing the vaccine, for example – and the CT value can start to climb again, and they bring back their magical disease.
We’ve all been watching this fall together but this concise excerpt lays the playbook wide open. Thanks for posting Kevin.
Yes, great post!
The amount of noise out there is unbelievable. I sometimes spend hours slogging through it and I look at what I’ve posted and think, “That’s it???” Then I need to pass out.
I’ve been doing this a long time and there has never been so much chaff flying around. Dead ends, poisoned wells, limited hangouts, etc. And that’s before the censorship.
Most qPCR machines default to run 40 cycles. The Ct value is the “threshold” PCR cycle at which the gene expression goes exponential and thus becomes detectable via fluorescence. Highly expressed genes have Ct values around 12-18. These are so called housekeeping genes that are in all cells. Lower expressed genes have Ct values in the 20s or low 30s. Once you get up to the 30-35+ range, most scientists don’t have confidence in the numbers because you could be amplifying DNA from dust particles (fingernails, hair, etc). If you want to give the WHO and testing centers the benefit of the doubt, they are going to err on the side of caution with at 36 Ct value when others have no detectable signal. Regarding COVID Ct values, I found this link:
https://www.aacc.org/cln/cln-stat/2020/december/3/sars-cov-2-cycle-threshold-a-metric-that-matters-or-not
One retrospective cohort study evaluated 314 patients admitted to the hospital with a positive SARS-CoV-2 test and viral pneumonia. Investigators used RT-PCR testing to group patients into three genomic load cohorts: low (Ct ?35), intermediate (25<Ct<35), and high (Ct? 25). Following the patients for an average of 25 days, they determined that high genomic load at presentation predicted adverse outcomes independent of age, comorbidities, and severity of illness at presentation.