Who Gets Your Vote for U.S. President?
July 25th, 2016Let’s assume everyone reading this is eligible to vote in the upcoming election.
I'm voting for...
- Donald Trump (35%, 206 Votes)
- I'm not voting (29%, 168 Votes)
- Some other candidate (26%, 150 Votes)
- Hillary Clinton (10%, 57 Votes)
Total Voters: 581
Loading ...
Posted in Dictatorship | Top Of Page
What do you think Kevin?
Is Trump the real deal? Because I fell for it but as we move forward it does kind of appear like a reality show that has been stages.
He was supposedly seen on the infamous pedo plane.
I’m not sure now. Previously, I thought Trump was just there to escort Hillary to the White House. You know, old pals:
https://img.washingtonpost.com/rf/image_1484w/2010-2019/WashingtonPost/2015/08/05/National-Politics/Images/GettyImages-843167781438807030.jpg
But his acceptance speech from the other night…
I’m going to borrow a phrase from Saturday Night Live and say that he’s got chunks of Hillary Clinton in his stool after that one.
I wasn’t expecting that.
I am now wondering if Hillary is here to usher in Trump.
They’re getting really good with the psyops I am so confused.
Hillary is establishment status quo – she’ll keep getting the US into a number of small to medium conflicts, perhaps more so than Obama in order to prevent being seen as weak in any way. She’ll keep poking Russia, but will she push them too far?
Trump – who knows? Everyone knows politicians lie through their teeth during election season, but at least with Hillary you’re pretty sure you know how she’s going to fuck you once she gets elected. Trump is a wild card. Could he be spouting electable garbage now and then turn into a pragmatic problem-solver? Could he treat the US like his favoured business model and default on debt? Could he walk away from NATO Article 5 and give the Russia the confidence to wind back NATO expansion? Could he get into power on a wave of populism then but himself way out of his depth in the great game?
Interesting times.
Trump talks about fiddling with NATO, pulling out of NAFTA, forcing Apple to make iPods in the U.S., etc. Building that wall on the southern border of the U.S. would reduce the supply of cheap labor in the U.S., eventually cutting off the flow of dollars into Mexico—which has been keeping Mexico from collapsing for decades.
Oh yeah: F the Chinese.
He obviously knows that China is holding a trillion-whatever dollars worth of U.S. debt. What’s the plan? Collapse the dollar to settle up? Cancel the debt and circle the wagons? On the financial front, the U.S. threw its own financial rudder overboard a long time ago. Trying to ducktape another one onto the sinking ship to turn it around at this late stage would have to upset the existing world order in a profound way.
Hillary Clinton is the candidate of the international order that sits atop a mountain of skulls. She’s the candidate of the system that vaporized two Japanese cities for effect. She’s the Highway of Death candidate. (Some of the kids reading won’t know what that is. Look it up.) She’s the covert narco trafficking candidate. She’s the candidate of the perpetrators of 9/11.
If Trump somehow finds his way to the White House, and I still can’t imagine that will happen, it means that he has been turned, or was in on the scam from the start.
Even people like us, people who know better, sometimes want to think that a vote for president offers some sort of way out of the mess we’re in. Is it?
Nooooooooooooooooope.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mJXYMDu6dpY
The president is really just middleware that sits between the controllers and the victims. That’s why I stopped participating.
So, as per usual, I’m not voting. However, in theory, I’d pick Trump simply to be invigorated to have a look at a different type of crooked regime. The prospect of having to maintain Cryptogon through another Bush regime, wearing pantsuits this time, after eight years of a Bush regime in blackface… I don’t really know how I could manage.
President as middleware–yup. Clinton as the candidate of the international order that sits atop a mountain of skulls, a covert narco trafficking queen representing the crew that did 9/11–yup yup
If Trump gets in it means he has been turned, or was in on the scam from the start? I’m becoming more convinced that Trump is the middleware for a different faction of the Deep State, which has largely differentiated itself from the collaboratory status quo over the last decade.
A member of this separate group would be Admiral William J Fallon, CENTCOM commander from 3/16/07 to 3/11/08. His tenure at CENTCOM was during the maximum Neocon/Neobolshevik push to utterly destroy Iran. He reportedly said behind the scenes that an attack on Iran “is not going to happen on my watch” and “there are a group of us working to put the crazies back in the box”
The conflict between factions written about in this short article is just a hint at what has been going on behind the scenes. http://sputniknews.com/middleeast/20151221/1032114120/pentagon-passed-intelligence-assad.html
The selection process for the presidential candidates appears to show a transition from the mostly hidden factional fighting to open warfare.
I’m not an American so obviously I can’t vote, but I am now living in Latvia (yeah, odd choice – good doctors compared to the useless ones back in British Isles and my wife is Russian) and the locals are getting hot and bothered about Trump’s comments on NATO.
It’s hard to say which of the two candidates is ideal from the perspective of the controllers behind the scenes in advancing the agenda.
I actually have a theory that Trump might be better suited for prosecuting America’s side of the coming global war that Putin is warning everyone about than psycho Hillary is. Especially if the game plan is to goad Russia to attack first; under that model, a flag-waving populist might be better at rallying the populace than a grimacing old leftie hag. Let’s not forget, the current US nuclear posture is set to absorb a first strike and then to formulate a narrative-driven reaction – check out the words of Major General C. Donald Alston who, in an interview related in Ron Rosenbaum’s 2011 book, How The End Begins, says,
“So that there’s such world attention on how the injured… the United States intends to respond, but there is a great deal of extraordinarily difficult decisions and there’s got to be cases for alternative decisions other than just nukin’ ’em back. With such world support, why would the United States take a course of action A, B, C?”
So for me, if they intend WW3 to happen soon, they will ensure Trump gets in.
On the other hand, if the plan is more slow boil, I think it will be Hillary.
Either way, voting seems an irrelevant psyop designed to let everyone rattle their chains a bit.
55% of your respondents are opting out of the two-party menu.
THE MAJORITY FEEL THE “CHOSEN” CANDIDATES ARE UN-ELECTABLE. but by default, one of them will be it anyway.
wtf are we doing in the US? the system is clearly broken.
i heard canada–and now also some island in ireland–is advertising to facilitate immigration for US citizens fleeing for political reasons.
Keep in mind, Cryptogon readers are probably the least representative sample of potential voters that one could imagine. And this poll only shows people who interacted with the widget. Something like 2000 people saw the post but didn’t make a choice on the poll.