‘U.S. Nuclear Weapons Have Been Compromised by Unidentified Aerial Objects’
September 23rd, 2010Update: Videos from Press Conference
—End Update—
This is another case of me posting a story to stop the submissions from coming in.
Guys, this is old information.
Also see:
4 Hour Witness DVD – Part 1 of 2
4 Hour Witness DVD – Part 2 of 2
My linking to those videos is not to be seen as an endorsement of Steven Greer, but the witness accounts are interesting.
Via: Press Release / Reuters:
Witness testimony from more than 120 former or retired military personnel points to an ongoing and alarming intervention by unidentified aerial objects at nuclear weapons sites, as recently as 2003. In some cases, several nuclear missiles simultaneously and inexplicably malfunctioned while a disc-shaped object silently hovered nearby. Six former U.S. Air Force officers and one former enlisted man will break their silence about these events at the National Press Club and urge the government to publicly confirm their reality.
I know those links don’t mean that you endorse Greer but while we are talking about him, I would like to share that I think he is a disinfo agent, trying to mix facts with fiction suck that we think facts are fictions.
I got this idea from reading this: http://www.jp-petit.org/Disclosure/disclosure_a_doubt.htm
Here is a quick summary if you don’t feel like reading it: It’s basicly a guy who is trying to contact the Greer team disclose what he knows about different technologies (namely stuff related to the X-43A prototype among other things). He posted a list of email exchange he got with the team. At first the team looks happy to talk to him. But then after he sent them the first draft explaining what he want to disclose, they don’t even bother to email him back and he will never be able to get an answer from them after numerous try to contact them again.
Whether or not you beleive what he is trying to disclose is all totaly true or not is not the point. The point is the greer team is always posting stuff about unverifiable claims, but when someone comes with stuffs that seems to make more sense than the average things they post, they totaly ignore him.
So for me anything that is Greer related is to take with extreme caution.
Of course, in the first comment, someone tries to turn this into a discussion about Steven Greer…
I’ll state it again: “The witness accounts are interesting.”
There are many more serious problems with Steven Greer than what you mention. I get it, more than most people reading this. As I’ve said before, calling this disinfo and that disinfo is a huge circle jerk, but while we’re at it, people who lump the witnesses into the same boat as Greer are as much of a problem as Greer, in my opinion.
Well, thanks for posting this, it was news to me.
Well, for what it’s worth, all my old buddies from the Polaris-era missile test crews have individually and separately told me stories similar to these over the years. Especially at sea, and especially at night, according to them. If nothing else, the witness accounts are interesting, like Kevin says.