Court Ruling: Monsanto’s Genetically Engineered Sugar Beets Pose Risk of Irreparable Environmental Harm
December 3rd, 2010In case you’re wondering how this is going to wind up (on appeal), here are some hints:
Monsanto Wins as Supreme Court Backs Alfalfa Seed Planting
Change We Can Believe In: Obama Chooses Monsanto Creature, Tom Vilsack, for Secretary of Agriculture
Has Obama Ever Met an Industrial Food Shill He Didn’t Appoint?
Via: AP:
A federal judge in California has ordered the removal from the ground of plants grown to produce seeds for genetically modified sugar beets, citing the potential for environmental harm.
The ruling by U.S. District Judge Jeffrey White has again raised questions about the use of genetically modified crops and what will happen if growers aren’t allowed to plant GMO seeds.
About 95 percent of the sugar beet crop has been genetically modified to resist the weed killer Roundup. The crop provides roughly half of the nation’s sugar supply.
In his decision, White cited, “a significant risk of environmental harm.”
White ruled in a lawsuit filed by environmental groups challenging a decision in September by the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Animal and Plant Health Inspection Services to issue permits to seed companies to plant sugar beet stecklings. The young plants produce seeds that then are planted to grow sugar beets.
The agency decided to issue the permits despite an August ruling by White that put a hold on future planting of genetically modified sugar beets. The ruling allowed this year’s crop to be harvested and processed, but the current seed crop was not to be planted until the USDA reviewed the effects the crops could have on other food.
In his order Tuesday, White wrote that the environmental groups had shown that the genetically modified sugar beets could contaminate other crops, including through cross-pollination.
“The likely environmental harm is irreparable,” White wrote.
It’s the roundup that harms the environment. It is willful poisoning of the soil.
Everytime I read something about GMO the discussion revolves around the genes, not the chemicals monsanto wants to use.
Those genes die out if they aren’t useful for anything, they do not harm anybody directly. Hey, it is for sugar anyway, not for vitamins.
Readers: consider to support something like Pro Specie Rara, maybe that helps for the renewal after the crash.
Those genes die out if they aren’t useful for anything, they do not harm anybody directly.
These genes don’t harm anybody directly????
Transgenic contamination of native Mexican corn varieties, for example, doesn’t harm anyone?