Compressing video on a 1.8Ghz Pentium 4 is proving to be incredibly slow. It took about three hours to do a high quality, full res, two pass Windows Media encode of only ten minutes of video. The CPU utilization went to 100% the entire time and that sucker got hot. I set my coffee cup next to the fan output on the laptop to keep my beverage warm.
Clearly, there's got to be a better way.
Is anyone out there using dual G5 Macs with the Flip4Mac WMV Export Component encoder? What's the speed like using that thing? Are the results as good as Microsoft's free Windows Media Encoder? Unfortunately, I need to produce WMVs for end users. Yep, WMV is required.
If Apple actually releases a dual-dual core G5 system, well, would there be any question about the fastest way to encode video? Dual-dual core G5s?! Man... That would be something...
Apple's compression specs for current systems are impressive vs. the Pentium/Xeon systems, but are these numbers believable? I've learned, over the years, to ignore Apple's claims. I'd especially like to hear from people who have switched from Windows/Intel to the Mac, and people like me, who switched to the Mac a couple of years ago, and switched back to Windows/Intel because of the speed difference.
I'm considering the switch again.
Of course, the solution might be to buy a couple junk PCs for a few hundred bucks and use Microsoft's free encoder to do the jobs. A less elegant solution, perhaps, but viable:
Apple's newest CHUD 4.1.0 toolset includes an updated MONster.app. This updated version includes clues for a new Apple Quad G5 Power Mac, which would utilize two dual-core 970MP chips.
posted by Kevin at 11:42 AM