CNN: “PENTAGON OFFICIALS DISCUSSING HOW TO RESPOND IF TRUMP ISSUES CONTROVERSIAL ORDERS”
November 9th, 2024I have written multiple warnings to be out of U.S. cities starting from before the election. People are asking me if the situation is ok now.
No, the situation is not ok now.
If Donald Trump does 5% of what he has said he is going to do, it would be the largest shakeup of the U.S. Government since JFK was assassinated. The secret team that took control in the wake of the JFK assassination, which sits atop a mountain of skulls and trillions of stolen dollars, is not going to willingly change course.
I have no idea what’s going to happen, but even if everything goes smoothly with the inauguration, watch out.
And, after it’s all over, if Americans wind up with a national ID card, perhaps provided by Vance’s friend and Palantir founder and chairman, Peter Thiel, well… Mission Accomplished.
Via: CNN:
Pentagon officials are holding informal discussions about how the Department of Defense would respond if Donald Trump issues orders to deploy active-duty troops domestically and fire large swaths of apolitical staffers, defense officials told CNN.
Trump has suggested he would be open to using active-duty forces for domestic law enforcement and mass deportations and has indicated he wants to stack the federal government with loyalists and “clean out corrupt actors” in the US national security establishment.
Trump in his last term had a fraught relationship with much of his senior military leadership, including now-retired Gen. Mark Milley who took steps to limit Trump’s ability to use nuclear weapons while he was chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. The president-elect, meanwhile, has repeatedly called US military generals “woke,” “weak” and “ineffective leaders.”
Officials are now gaming out various scenarios as they prepare for an overhaul of the Pentagon.
“We are all preparing and planning for the worst-case scenario, but the reality is that we don’t know how this is going to play out yet,” one defense official said.
“has indicated he wants to stack the federal government with loyalists”
Loyalists to the Constitution, not to the Deep State. The author failed to specify that so as to imply the opposite to his readers.