“Real-Time Self-Assembly of Stereomicroscopically Visible Artificial Constructions in Incubated Specimens of mRNA Products Mainly from Pfizer and Moderna: A Comprehensive Longitudinal Study” [???]
September 7th, 2024Stories of synthetic nanorobots in the Covid vaccines started emerging almost immediately after the vaccines came out. I’m mainly posting this to let people know, yes, I know about it. I’ve known about it for years. I didn’t know what to make of it then. I still don’t know what to make of it:
Note: The Dr. John Campbell video, originally uploaded to YouTube, is indicating that it was removed by the uploader. I have added a backup.
***WARNING – Those who have been injected with the experimental mRNA Gene Therapies may to want to sit down before watching this video
Dr. John Campbell presents new peer reviewed papers which confirm the presence of mRNA nanostructures in the COVID-19 injectables
NOTE: I have… pic.twitter.com/kQmAetRzwB
— Shaun Rickard (@ShaunRickard67) September 7, 2024
Additionally, I’ve not been confident that some of the people who are investigating this know what they’re doing at all. I apologize, I don’t remember the source, but in one presentation, the person tried to represent an air bubble under a cover slip as some sort of nanobot. Having taken 10th grade biology, I knew what an air bubble under a cover slip looked like! I turned my discernment filter up to 11 on this.
And then…
Lots of people started submitting stories about how the vaccines were supposedly causing vaccinated people to emit bluetooth signals. I have decades of experience with IT, computer networking, system administration, etc., so this was an easy one to call total nonsense on right away. Always open to experimentation, I even looked for bluetooth devices in a literal roomful of people that took three+ shots. Guess how many anomalous bluetooth signals I found?
Zero.
(If you saw the scrap heap of what I filter out on a day to day basis in order to keep the signal to noise ratio high on this site…)
With deep events, we’re always going to have the equivalent of vaccines-causing-people-to-become-bluetooth-radios type stories poisoning the well. It’s by design.
Can we put the Covid vaccine nanobots to rest as easily as the bluetooth nonsense?
If you followed Jikkyleaks during Covid, here’s their take:
My view reading this is:
This paper was submitted to the IJVTPR to discredit it because it’s one of the few journals that allows criticism of pharmaceutical companies.
…
It’s well poisoning so we can’t talk about #plasmidgate
…
Fibres, crystals, hyphae from fungal contamination after a year of incubation
I don’t even know where to start. I like John. But he’s being deceived.
I intuit, have extensive background and years of research under my belt to support a claim that this is a red herring.
KNOW IT FOR YOURSELF. BY SEEKING.
The shots are dangerous, YES. But seek to discover WHY IN ACTUALITY THAT THEY DANGEROUS.
Think amyloids. Think LNP chaos. Think membrane potential disruption. Think immune dysfunction. Think metabolic collapse of cells. Think lack of CQAs and potency assays. Think assholes trying to gain financially.
Don’t give up your common sense and rationality for a sensationalized version of the truth.
There is no doubt that nanorobotics is real, but that doesn’t necessarily mean that it’s present in the Covid shots. I would be very interested in hearing from anyone with a PhD in a relevant field who thinks the nanobots situation is happening with the Covid vaccines.
Via: International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice, and Research:
In addition to cellular toxicity, our findings reveal numerous…visible artificial self-assembling entities ranging from about 1 to 100 µm, or greater, of many different shapes. There were animated worm-like entities, discs, chains, spirals, tubes, right-angle structures containing other artificial entities within them, and so forth. All these are exceedingly beyond any expected and acceptable levels of contamination of the COVID-19 injectables, and incubation studies revealed the progressive self-assembly of many artifactual structures. As time progressed during incubation, simple one- and two-dimensional structures over two or three weeks became more complex in shape and size developing into stereoscopically visible entities in three-dimensions. They resembled carbon nanotube filaments, ribbons, and tapes, some appearing as transparent, thin, flat membranes, and others as three-dimensional spirals, and beaded chains. Some of these seemed to appear and then disappear over time. Our observations suggest the presence of some kind of nanotechnology in the COVID-19 injectables.
Thanks for keeping this site a high signal to noise ratio.