Former NSA Director Joins OpenAI; Will Serve On Board And “Security” Committee

June 14th, 2024

Chat GPT-4o: OpenAI’s New Realtime Multimodal Model:

This will make the individual profiling and surveillance that has been done by search engines for decades seem trivial.

OpenAI almost certainly wants this to be free for everyone in order to gather up as much personal and training data as possible.

OpenAI is probably able to review each of these sessions in order to make changes to how the system behaves. This means that the sessions could be made available to government and law enforcement agencies.

And now…

Via: ZeroHedge:

Days after we noted that OpenAI is expanding its lobbying army to influence regulation, the company announced that former head of the National Security Agency (NSA) – and the longest-serving leader of USCYBERCOM, Paul M. Nakasone, has joined board – just four months after stepping down at the government’s top clandestine data monitoring organization.

Nakasone, a retired US Army general, was nominated to lead the NSA by former President Donald Trump. He directed the agency from 2018 until his departure in February of this year. AsThe Verge notes, Nakasone wrote a WaPo op-ed in support of renewing Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA), which was ultimately reauthorized by Congress in April – which contained a “terrifying” supercharged spying provision opposed by privacy advocates on both sides of the aisle in DC.

Related: AI Relies On Mass Surveillance

4 Responses to “Former NSA Director Joins OpenAI; Will Serve On Board And “Security” Committee”

  1. Snowman says:

    Would you repeat that, Mr President? I don’t think anybody heard you. “Beware of” what?

  2. NH says:

    Elon considers Geoffrey Hinton one of the smartest people on AI—discussing the evolution and risks:

    https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1801976488251814048

    His take is that the only hope of reigning it in is government oversight and regulation, due to the competitive nature of capitalism—but what hope is that, when it seems like it’s an existential race between countries? Beyond that, the inevitable integration of this actor into the mutually assured destruction (MAD) dynamic of nuclear weapons just seems completely destabilizing.

  3. Snowman says:

    Oversight and regulation? Yep, that works — look at how pure and wholesome our vaccines are, even our drinking water in our sparkling clean cities. And other countries like China and North Korea will be sure to follow our lead, right?

    Why do all these experts and pundits carry on as though we’ll fix every mess we’ve made, for sure? How’s our track record on that so far?

  4. rototillerman says:

    We’re fucked. Prepare accordingly by building out your relationships in the non-digital world.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.