Are Emergency Powers A Test To See What Americans Will Put Up With?
September 11th, 2023Via: ZeroHedge:
During the hysteria of the covid pandemic questions swirled around how the federal government would respond to the events under the declaration of a national health emergency. What kind of powers would they claim to have and which constitutional rights would they try to suppress? What many Americans did not consider, however, was the implementation of emergency powers under state governments rather than the White House.
Most of the covid mandates crushing the US economy during that period were not federal mandates, but state mandates, and there’s a good reason why covid tyrants chose to focus on state level restrcitions.
There are a number of requirements and obstacles for any president seeking to enforce mandates at the federal level, along with more scrutiny and oversight than is commonly understood. Though a president can declare emergencies unilaterally, there are still some legal checks and balances (to be sure, these are quietly being eroded with each passing year).
On the other hand, state governors in 44 states have sweeping authorities under emergency conditions, with very little immediate legal recourse. As we have seen recently in places like Hawaii and now New Mexico, Democrat governors have been playing with fire (no pun intended) as they seek to push the envelope of emergency controls at the state level.
Are they a test? Yes. So are the false flags, from Maui back to 9/11 and before, and every other sort of anti-social, anti-prosperity, anti-health, etc, action they’ve taken against us as part of their evolving pogrom. The bully twists your fingers, then your arm, then reaches for your neck. Knock his legs out from under him before he puts you in a chokehold. It won’t always be as easy leaving your mask at home or just saying no to the jab, but the sooner we take mass action — resist, investigate, publicize — the sooner the bully will back down.