Queensland: All-Cause Mortality Started Trending Upwards with Vax Rollout, Not Covid
August 16th, 2023Via: Dystopian Down Under:
Prior to the pandemic, Australians were living longer, with death rates amongst older Australians trending downwards. But in 2021, that trendline upturned, and Australia started chalking up excess mortality at rates not seen since WWII.
When exactly did the mortality trend change, and why?
This is the question data analyst Andrew Madry set out to answer in a new report for the Australian Medical Professionals Society (AMPS), as part of an investigation into Australia’s ongoing excess deaths.
Madry selected Queensland mortality data as the perfect dataset to analyse because it offers a clear picture of mortality trends throughout three distinct sets of conditions:
No Covid, no vaccinations (2020)
No Covid, almost full population vaccination coverage (2021)
Covid and almost full population vaccination coverage (2022)
What he found was a clearly marked upturn in all-cause mortality (ACM) among those aged 60 and older coinciding with the primary series vaccine rollout, from around March 2021.
You have to wonder just how vast this experiment really is. Every vax, every swab, was connected to an ID. And of course it started with batch numbers for tracking various formulas.
(remainder of comment deleted)
One has to wonder if the COVID phenomenon that we experienced was an experiment, after all. The UN document that announced they were going to do it called it a drill, necessary because they expected the real thing (some deadly disease requiring emergency reaction) to come via Mother Nature sooner rather than later. (Of course, their expectations were met by themselves — it came from them, as did the reaction.) Maybe the vaccine had already been developed and the batches of varying contents and lethality had been tested and assigned to different groups of people around the world before they announced there was such a virus as COVID (which has yet to be proven to actually exist). Has any investigator considered that?
Over the years, I have realized that many of the ‘new’ problems the world suffers did not just pop up out of the blue. First, they’re called an unknown, although they can conveniently be related to one of their hoaxes, like climate change, for example. Then, after the alt-news investigates and digs up some facts, they admit to having been aware of the problem for awhile and having been quietly working on how to fix it (as in, ‘the fix is in’). More investigation by the normals, and more admissions of earlier and earlier involvement by the globalists. I don’t know when the concept of climate change was first introduced to us, but I am positive that I saw chemtrails in an x-pattern grid over the Albany, NY, airport in 1990, although “An Inconvenient Truth” didn’t come out till 2006 to establish the climate change idea as a problem, and they have yet to officially admit to chemtrails. They now say they are thinking about investigating the possibility of blocking sunlight through various means, although scientists have been trying to do cloud seeding since the later 1800’s. Google says it started in 1946 — see what I mean? Google is lying by telling only part of the truth, perhaps so you won’t ask what was being done between 1900 and 1946, let alone ask whether climate change is real.
Who knows if or when the full story of COVID will come out, if it ever does. But so as not to be fooled again, we must to look at everything they say through the lens of what they’ve said in the past and what was actually done. We also have to make our own observations and take seriously the observations of others. (When AIDS appeared in Africa, people there said it was being caused by something in the medicines the locals were given by NGO’s. The science is still somewhat uncertain as to whether it really is a virus that attacks the immune system. Hmmm…) They re-framed the COVID genocide as a drill to help them plan how to save us from a deadly, naturally-evolved disease. Many investigators question if there ever was that disease, but there is no question that their cure for it is a killer for targeted groups. And, as Dale points out, it fits so very neatly into their other plans, like total surveillance of every one of us, that it could hardly be an experiment, but a plan long in the making and now accomplished. We have to get better at seeing these things coming, and unmasking their fake terminology and lying-by-omission will really help us.
Just saw this. I don’t subscribe to Off-Guardian so can’t read its full articles online. This is from another site’s copy. I noticed both “the language in the headlines implies it’s been ‘adapted” and “claim that they did a trial”.
Off-Guardian – Aug 18, 2023
https://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?p=272437
“The next round of Covid “vaccines” hits the shelves next month. For those who have lost count, I think we’re up to six or seven shots now. This ‘updated vaccine’ is nothing to do with Eris [the latest version of COVID], of course, as much as the language in the headlines implies it’s been ‘adapted’ for the latest variant, it hasn’t. It was in the works before Eris was even said to exist.
“Moderna had the brass neck to claim that they did a ‘trial’ showing their updated vaccine protects against Eris. Considering Eris first hit the headlines just a few weeks ago it looks like Moderna may have broken their own record in terms of speedy ‘trials’.”