Mortality Rates Are Lowest Among the Unvaccinated in All Age-Groups
June 26th, 2023Chart shows the monthly age-standardized mortality rates by vaccination status among each age group for Non-Covid-19 deaths in England between January and May 2022, according to a recently published dataset collated by the UK Government agency, the Office for National Statistics pic.twitter.com/NUw2u9XFLk
— Patrick Webb (@pwleaks) June 25, 2023
Via: Leading Report:
The following charts show the monthly age-standardized mortality rates by vaccination status among each age group for Non-Covid-19 deaths in England between January and May 2022…
This is for “non-Covid” deaths only. Deaths from all causes (“Covid” AND “non-Covid”) show that three-dose vaccinated fare the best for most months and across age groups (except the 90+) until December 2022 (last data available). The unvaccinated are a decent second. For the vaccinated who did non boost up to the third dose, results were initially good before turning catastrophic.
https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/birthsdeathsandmarriages/deaths/datasets/deathsbyvaccinationstatusengland
(table 2)
Hex, I can’t open the xls file to read the data you summarize; my computer has very limited abilities. But, your summary suggests that the vaccine and first two boosters contributed to Covid, while the third not only reversed those bad effects but actually protected people from Covid.
Do vaccines usually act this way? Or, is the third dose going to be bad, too, but hasn’t had enough time yet for the badness to show up? Or, should we all just skip all vaccine shots till the last booster arrives, then get that one if we don’t mind it making us more vulnerable to all other diseases?
Such questions might be answered in the document somewhere, for those who can access it. They make me curious as to how the data analysts interpreted these numbers.
Does anybody know if ONS is one of those counting patients within two weeks of their first shot as unvaccinated?
Dennis, what would be the justification for that classification? Is the vaccine believed to take two weeks to produce protection after injection? That info ought to be in the report somewhere.
There are so many ways to make data indicate whatever you want it to indicate that we’d have to know everything the data analysts know in order to judge the accuracy of their analyses.
The global bottom line seems to be that many if not all of the covid vaccination programs as well as several other govt-mandated vaccines do more harm than good.
It took about 5 months for the first dose to show blatant negative consequences ; closer to 9 months for the second dose. So maybe the third dose rollout, which started in October 2021, has yet to show its morbidity potential (as of December 2022).
This ONS data has separate categories for those who took their dose less than 21 days before dying. As to the reliability of that data, I could not say. Norman Fenton has expressed concerns.
https://www.normanfenton.com/covid-19
I am not vaccinated against Covid-19.
I believe this was done in a number of Western jurisdictions. The justification was that, supposedly, it took about that long for the body to mount its immune response post-shot.
Complicating things further is the fact some lethal side effects are strongly temporally associated with the shot resulting in deaths for other causes post-vax also being counted as unvaccinated deaths, and in some cases if these were ‘with covid’ ending up classed as ‘from covid’.
Interesting that in the 50-59 age bracket which is the one I’m most concerned about, it looks like triple-vaccinated folk are doing better than unvaccinated.
Because of the unknowns you all point out, I don’t see how we can ever get clear-cut and reliable info out of this report. Someone as cynical as I might suspect that that was the intent of its authors and sponsors.