The Next Phase in U.S. Government UFO Disclosure: “Intelligence Officials Say U.S. Has Retrieved Craft of Non-Human Origin”
June 5th, 2023Another conspiracy theory that turned out to be true. I guess Men in Black got it right. #Kennedy24https://t.co/zdM2o9OhBG
— Robert F. Kennedy Jr (@RobertKennedyJr) June 6, 2023
—
—
Via: The Debrief:
A former intelligence official turned whistleblower has given Congress and the Intelligence Community Inspector General extensive classified information about deeply covert programs that he says possess retrieved intact and partially intact craft of non-human origin.
The information, he says, has been illegally withheld from Congress, and he filed a complaint alleging that he suffered illegal retaliation for his confidential disclosures, reported here for the first time.
Other intelligence officials, both active and retired, with knowledge of these programs through their work in various agencies, have independently provided similar, corroborating information, both on and off the record.
The whistleblower, David Charles Grusch, 36, a decorated former combat officer in Afghanistan, is a veteran of the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency (NGA) and the National Reconnaissance Office (NRO). He served as the reconnaissance office’s representative to the Unidentified Aerial Phenomena Task Force from 2019-2021. From late 2021 to July 2022, he was the NGA’s co-lead for UAP analysis and its representative to the task force.
…
Grusch said the recoveries of partial fragments through and up to intact vehicles have been made for decades through the present day by the government, its allies, and defense contractors. Analysis has determined that the objects retrieved are “of exotic origin (non-human intelligence, whether extraterrestrial or unknown origin) based on the vehicle morphologies and material science testing and the possession of unique atomic arrangements and radiological signatures,” he said.
In filing his complaint, Grusch is represented by a lawyer who served as the original Intelligence Community Inspector General (ICIG).
“We are not talking about prosaic origins or identities,” Grusch said, referencing information he provided Congress and the current ICIG. “The material includes intact and partially intact vehicles.”
What I wrote below is not to say that there are no UFO’s or that Earth govts haven’t captured any. Only that, for some reason, they keep telling us there are in narratives that appear to be heavily fictionalized. My evidence:
VARGAS: “Bombshell claims from a military whistleblower… world news exclusive… explosive allegations… earning your trust, every night.” I notice the reporter’s key words that are intended to trigger our interest and belief.
Grush’s face is shown in a clip from his interview. He is listening and replying to the interviewer, but we hear no audio. That makes it easier for us to focus entirely on his body language, believing what it says, regardless of his words. He is staring unblinking at the interviewer, nodding agreement, and he keeps restraining a little smile that keeps popping up. His facial expressions are tight, he is tense, controlling himself, but eager to do his thing. Whatever the interviewer is saying, Grusch is taking it personally, and it pleases him. He replies enthusiastically.
VARGAS: Another reporter, Brian Enton, will come next to tell us more. “This is a blockbuster.”
ENTON: “It is a blockbuster… this takes it all to another level…” He gives background on the govt’s UAP program and on Grush. We are not told Grush’s rank, though anyone who knows what his uniform insignia mean will know it. I don’t, and I wonder why it is not stated. He wears pins and medals, but not the rows of ribbons that I usually see on officer’s uniforms. What does that mean?
Coulthart and Grush enter a studio. Grush is holding back a smile. Happy to be on tv to tell his story? So why hold back his smile? They sit down opposite each other. Grush quickly switches to a blank face. Too quickly.
COULTHART: “You are one of the most trusted former intelligence officials in the US defense and intelligence establishment.”
GRUSCH: Staring directly into Coulthart’s eyes, but too hard a stare, too steady and unblinking. “Yes, I was.” Stated with a jerk of the chin, a gesture which implies, ‘Yeah, you got any problem with that?’, as if to establish a tough guy persona, followed by a restrained smile, as if pleased with himself, then nodding yes to reinforce his verbal ‘yes’ message. We often see a tv news presenters nodding yes, as though in agreement, when on screen while another presenter is talking. They’ve been taught that nodding along with the other presenter’s speech helps convince the audience of the truth of their story. They all nod robotically so much and so often that they look like bobble-head dolls.
COULTHART: “You were trusted with the most intimate secrets.” Stated while slowly nodding yes.
GRUSCH: “Yes, I was.” He glances up to the left as he tells his story, as though recalling an actual experience, not making it up; he pulls his eyebrows together, wrinkling his forehead between his eyes as though concentrating intentently on his story; he waves his hands in or just above his lap to emphasize his words. These moves are appropriate to the image he is trying to portray, tough but truthful, but the timing is a little off, and the are gestures sometimes too intense, sometimes too restrained or jerky to be spontaneous. He’s got his story down pat but is working hard to control his body language. The little self-satisfied smile keeps sneaking in.
I quit observing at 3:55, when Grush agrees that we have quite a number of these craft, and Coulter responds, “You’re kidding.” I thought, yeah, they are both kidding. Grusch seems to be well-trained in how to behave but doesn’t have enough experience to make it look completely natural. This looks like yet another psy-op to me. I’m not interested in seeing the rest of the show; real life is demanding my attention.