New York University Bioethicist: Fight Global Warming by Using Genetic Engineering to Birth Smaller Children, Create Pharmaceuticals That Trigger Nausea Upon Ingestion of Meat
March 12th, 2012Via: The Atlantic:
The threat of global climate change has prompted us to redesign many of our technologies to be more energy-efficient. From lightweight hybrid cars to long-lasting LED’s, engineers have made well-known products smaller and less wasteful. But tinkering with our tools will only get us so far, because however smart our technologies become, the human body has its own ecological footprint, and there are more of them than ever before. So, some scholars are asking, what if we could engineer human beings to be more energy efficient? A new paper to be published in Ethics, Policy & Environment proposes a series of biomedical modifications that could help humans, themselves, consume less.
Some of the proposed modifications are simple and noninvasive. For instance, many people wish to give up meat for ecological reasons, but lack the willpower to do so on their own. The paper suggests that such individuals could take a pill that would trigger mild nausea upon the ingestion of meat, which would then lead to a lasting aversion to meat-eating. Other techniques are bound to be more controversial. For instance, the paper suggests that parents could make use of genetic engineering or hormone therapy in order to birth smaller, less resource-intensive children.
Related:
University of Melbourne ‘Ethicists’ Call for Legalized Murder of Newborns
UK Bioethicist: Pregnancy and Natural Birth Should Not Be Tolerated
“…Birth Smaller Children…”
<(snarc)…except those used for sports, such as basketball.(/snarc)