Captain Jonathan Bayless: Another Minot Air Force Base Death

February 3rd, 2009

The 91st Missile Wing is a U.S. Air Force strategic nuclear missile unit. They deal with the Minuteman III ICBMs.

I’ve added this to the Minot AFB Nuke Master Death List.

UPDATE: This is a Much Better Minot List Than Mine

Minot AFB Clandestine Nukes ‘Oddities’

Via: AP:

The body of a missile combat crew commander from the Minot Air Force was found by police and the cause of his death is under investigation, the Air Force says.

A statement issued by the base Sunday said the body of Capt. Jonathan Bayless, 28, was found Friday night. Police did not give details but said it was in an area north of the city soccer complex and they are awaiting autopsy results.

Col. Christopher Ayres, the base’s 91st Missile Wing commander, said Bayless was a training chief with the 91st Operations Support Squadron. He had been at the Minot Air Force Base since March 2005.

Bayless went on active duty in May 2003, the statement said. Base officials did not list his hometown but said he had been assigned earlier to Vandenberg Air Force Base for missile combat crew member training.

”The 91st Missile Wing has lost not only a valuable member of our team, but a member of our family, and he will be missed.” Ayres said in the statement.

The Air Force said casualty assistance officers and unit members are helping Bayless’ family and a memorial service is being planned.

2 Responses to “Captain Jonathan Bayless: Another Minot Air Force Base Death”

  1. Eileen says:

    I dunno.
    I’ve been following the Minot incident from Day 1.
    Something’s fishy. Nukes flying across America should not be such a BIG DEAL. People being murdered and all that nonsense.
    I wonder if the payload flying from Minot to Alabama, or wherever in the deep south “they” bury their bodies in these days didn’t have something more “special” in the bays?
    A flying saucer?
    Interesting to me that the Symington family of Arizona has been “in on” the ET phenomenon since day one.
    I read this article today only cause the U.S. government building I work in at times was named after Forrestal.
    From Solari.
    http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread432033/pg1
    If you can find Phoenix Lights watch it.
    Methinks history is repeating itself.
    A nuke is a nuke. I don’t think its something that requires top secret deaths. But a flying saucer? Ah, there’s the rub.

  2. anothernut says:

    “A nuke is a nuke. I don’t think its something that requires top secret deaths.”

    If the number of nukes on the ledger no longer matches the number of nukes in the actual stockpile, and the agent of that discrepancy wants that fact kept secret… That might require some top-secret deaths, don’t you think?

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.