GM Wants to Replace Much of U.S. Workforce with Lower-Paid New Hires; Offers Buyouts to 74,000 Current Employees

February 13th, 2008

The fact that GM is viable at all is the real news.

Via: CNN:

In an effort to shave ongoing losses, General Motors offered lucrative buyouts Tuesday to 74,000 employees – its entire U.S. hourly workforce.

The nation’s largest automaker announced the latest round of buyouts as it reported another loss on its core auto operations in the fourth quarter, which combined with charges taken earlier in the year left GM (GM, Fortune 500) with a company-record $38.7 billion net loss for 2007.

To try to stem automotive losses that have dogged the company since 2005, the company is making a range of offers, up to cash payments of $140,000 to the remaining 74,000 GM workers represented by the United Auto Workers union.

The goal is not to reduce headcount but rather to bring in new workers at a lower cost.

About 46,000 of the GM employees are eligible to retire today and they can take pension incentives worth between $45,000 to $62,500 to retire.

In addition there are inducements for those who are within five years of retirement to leave early and receive benefits.

Those who leave and agree to sever all ties with the company – including giving up lucrative pension and health care coverage – will receive a lump sum of $140,000 if they have 10 years of service. They will receive $70,000 if they have less than 10 years of service.

Posted in Economy | Top Of Page

One Response to “GM Wants to Replace Much of U.S. Workforce with Lower-Paid New Hires; Offers Buyouts to 74,000 Current Employees”

  1. tm says:

    GM’s plan is to eventually move all their manufacturing to China. They believe the way to get a leg up on the rest of the world’s automakers is to be the first to sell 100% Chinese made cars in the U.S. market.

    What really amazes me is that economists believe the U.S. economy as a whole can remain viable. Its incredible to read articles written by the globalist hacks at outfits like the Institute for International Economics insisting that the U.S. economy can continue growing even when we have a $1 Trillion annual trade deficit with China (which they’re predicting will occur within a few years). Even in the unlikely event that we don’t have a devasting financial crisis that wipes out the economy before then, what makes them think, after so much hollowing out of the U.S. economically, we’re even going to have the money to buy all that junk from China?

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.