US, UK, Australia, Canada and New Zealand Building Biometric Database

January 15th, 2008

This article expands on points touched on in FBI Prepares Vast Biometrics Database.

Of course, there’s still no mention of the fact that the states involved make up the ECHELON club.

A couple of interesting notes: Northrop Grumman built the systems that comprise the UK’s biometric fusion center known as IDENT1. Also, a future database for EU member states will also contain DNA profiles!

Via: Guardian:

Senior British police officials are talking to the FBI about an international database to hunt for major criminals and terrorists.

The US-initiated programme, “Server in the Sky”, would take cooperation between the police forces way beyond the current faxing of fingerprints across the Atlantic. Allies in the “war against terror” – the US, UK, Australia, Canada and New Zealand – have formed a working group, the International Information Consortium, to plan their strategy.

Biometric measurements, irises or palm prints as well as fingerprints, and other personal information are likely to be exchanged across the network. One section will feature the world’s most wanted suspects. The database could hold details of millions of criminals and suspects.

The FBI is keen for the police forces of American allies to sign up to improve international security. The Home Office yesterday confirmed it was aware of Server in the Sky, as did the Metropolitan police.

The plan will make groups anxious to safeguard personal privacy question how much access to UK databases is granted to foreign law enforcement agencies. There will also be concern over security, particularly after embarrassing data losses within the UK, and accuracy: in one case, an arrest for a terror offence by US investigators used what turned out to be misidentified fingerprint matches.

Britain’s National Policing Improvement Agency has been the lead body for the FBI project because it is responsible for IDENT1, the UK database holding 7m sets of fingerprints and other biometric details used by police forces to search for matches from scenes of crimes. Many of the prints are either from a person with no criminal record, or have yet to be matched to a named individual.

IDENT1 was built by the computer technology arm of the US defence company Northrop Grumman. In future it is expected to hold palm prints, facial images and video sequences. A company spokeswoman confirmed that Northrop Grumman had spoken to the FBI about Server in the Sky. “It can run independently but if existing systems are connected up to it then the intelligence agencies would have to approve,” she said.

The FBI told the Guardian: “Server in the Sky is an FBI initiative designed to foster the advanced search and exchange of biometric information on a global scale. While it is currently in the concept and design stages, once complete it will provide a technical forum for member nations to submit biometric search requests to other nations. It will maintain a core holding of the world’s ‘worst of the worst’ individuals. Any identifications of these people will be sent as a priority message to the requesting nation.”

In London, the NPIA confirmed it was aware of Server in the Sky but said it was “too early to comment on what our active participation might be”.

The FBI is proposing to establish three categories of suspects in the shared system: “internationally recognised terrorists and felons”, those who are “major felons and suspected terrorists”, and finally those who the subjects of terrorist investigations or criminals with international links. Tom Bush, assistant director at the FBI’s criminal justice information service, has said he hopes to see a pilot project for the programme up and running by the middle of the year.

Although each participating country would manage and secure its own data, the sharing of personal data between countries is becoming an increasingly controversial area of police practice. There is political concern at Westminster about the public transparency of such cooperation.

A similar proposal has emerged from the EU for closer security cooperation between the security services and police forces of member states, including allowing countries to search each other’s databases. Under what is known as the Prum treaty, there are plans to open up access to DNA profiles, fingerprints and vehicle registration numbers.

3 Responses to “US, UK, Australia, Canada and New Zealand Building Biometric Database”

  1. tmbchr says:

    I had the following dream about a year ago: I was in a fancy shopping mall, and used a urinal, which randomly administered a drug test and then correlated the results (I failed the test for having smoked a joint or something in the dream recently) to biometric data collected from the urinal’s light-sensitive “eye” thing and sensors throughout the mall.

    The beauty part though: I went to use a friend’s cell phone (having smashed mine with a big fat rock in my back yard in real life) immediately after that. And even though the cell phone was all paid up under my friend’s name, the phone itself recognized my voice imprint, connected it to the failed mall urinal drug test, and wouldn’t let me use it. My punishment for not obeying minor societal norms (drug use) was that my technocratic privileges had been curtailed.

    Seems all too possible.

  2. Tim says:

    The only thing missing from your dream was a thin film LCD screen at eye level beside the sensor that could have served you a ‘relevant’ ad for the latest self-help book or clinically approved anti-stress medicine.

    I was partly raised in a fundamentalist (heterodox) religion that I later drifted away from. The idea of an all-seeing, all-knowing Cosmic Father Figure that could see your every action – both good and bad, lost traction with me. It’s ironic that Voltaire’s busy little elves are burning the midnight oil to create the Technocratic equivalent of the aforementioned unaccountable Cosmic Father Figure.

    With the power of connected databases and parallel processing, iCFF will be able to giveth and taketh away your technocratic privileges.

  3. cryingfreeman says:

    @ Tim – whatever created the human mind is much more than a mere mind. I have no problem with an omniscient Creator. However, I do have a problem with pathetic creatures trying to usurp that Creator’s role and endlessly watch us and tell us what we can and cannot do, etc, etc.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.