Court Dismisses Shell Human Rights Abuse Case

September 24th, 2010

Via: TCE Today:

A US appeals court has dismissed a case against Shell in which it was accused of assisting the Nigerian government to commit human rights abuses in its attempts to suppress local groups protesting against oil activities in the 1990s.

In a written ruling, the three-judge panel of the US Court of Appeals ruled 2 to 1 that corporations are not liable in US courts for violations of international human rights law.

“Looking to international law, we find a jurisprudence, first set forth in Nuremberg and repeated by every international tribunal of which we are aware, that offences [for] violations of human rights can be charged against states and against individual men and women but not against juridical persons such as corporations,” circuit judge José Cabranes said in his ruling.

The case was brought by the families of seven Nigerians executed by the former Nigeria government. They alleged that Shell provided transportation to Nigerian forces, allowed its property to be used as a staging ground for attacks, and provided food and compensation for soldiers who carried out the attacks. They said this aided the government to torture and kill locals protesting oil exploration in the Ogani region of Nigeria.

Shell has denied the accusations.

The dissenting circuit judge Pierre Leval wrote: “The majority opinion deals a substantial blow to international law and its undertaking to protect fundamental human rights. According to the rule my colleagues have created, one who earns profits by commercial exploitation of abuse of fundamental human rights can successfully shield those profits from victims’ claims for compensation simply by taking the precaution of conducting the heinous operation in the corporate form.”

Speaking to Reuters, Jonathan Drimmer, a partner of US law firm Steptoe & Johnson said the impact of the ruling would be confined to those cases brought against corporations in the same court, and added that the strength of Leval’s dissent suggests there will be a further appeal.

Research Credit: ltcolonelnemo

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.