Pentagon Says, “Neither AATIP Nor AAWSAP Were UAP Related”

December 7th, 2019

You spin me right ’round, baby
Right ’round like a record, baby
Right ’round, ’round, ’round

Via: The Black Vault:

Claiming they want to correct the record and clear up some inaccuracies, the Pentagon now says AATIP was not a UFO or UAP program.

“Neither AATIP nor AAWSAP were UAP related,” said Pentagon spokesperson Susan Gough in an e-mail to The Black Vault. “The purpose of AATIP was to investigate foreign advanced aerospace weapons system applications with future technology projections over the next 40 years, and to create a center of expertise on advanced aerospace technologies.”

Since 2017, details have been scarce. However, the DoD’s latest position that AATIP wasn’t a UFO program, seems to represent one of their most dramatic about-faces on the issue since the program was first revealed.

The Pentagon’s new stance conflicts with former Department of Defense (DOD) employee, Luis Elizondo. According to Elizondo he was the director of AATIP, and since coming forward in October of 2017, he’s consistantly maintained AATIP did research UFOs / UAPs. “AATIP itself spent its entire time on UFOs,” said Elizondo in March of 2019 at the first annual Anomalous Aerospace Phenomena (AAP) conference put on by the Scientific Coalition for UAP Studies (SCU). “AATIP was a 100% UFO program, period. It was not looking at airplanes.”

In an already confusing saga,the Pentagon continues to deny Elizondo’s role and participation in the AATIP. According to Gough, Elizondo was, “not the director of the AATIP,” and reiterated he had “no assigned responsibilities” within the program.

One Response to “Pentagon Says, “Neither AATIP Nor AAWSAP Were UAP Related””

  1. NH says:

    https://www.darkjournalist.com/s-ufodelonge.php

    Long-running PYSOP of the deep state bankster/intelligence faction currently attempting a coup.
    Counterattack by the Trump faction?

    https://www.cryptogon.com/?p=55053

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.